healthcare + design award: fighting pneumonia in remote areas

Posted by | Posted in Access to Health, Conferences, Data, Design, Global Health, Maternal and Child Health, Medical Devices | Posted on 13-08-2009

I just discovered an interesting blog: healthcare + design and they had this post up on design excellence awards. Not sure how much this Breath Counter costs, but worth investigating further:

“Fighting Pneumonia: Breath Counter The Breath Counter is a simple, effective testing device to help detect pneumonia in children under five, living in remote areas in developing countries. Pneumonia is the number one cause of death in the under five worldwide, killing an average of two million each year. The disease is diagnosed by counting the number of breaths taken by the patient in one minute, as those infected will have a much higher count than healthy children. But despite the relative simplicity of detection, the current timing device distributed by NGOs is too basic and unreliable.  Philips Design has created a reliable, easy to use solution that addresses the problems identified by the NGOs in the field. Powered by solar cells, the Breath Counters lifespan is potentally five years longer than what is currently available. An LED screen logs three test results, making them easy to compare. Aesthetically, the Breath Counter looks like a medical tool, to give the user a feeling of commitment and contribution to this important issue. For users who cannot read, Philips Design created a simple manual with clear visuals that explain the procedure.”
fightingpneumonia

Philanthropy by Design
“The Breath Counter was created within Philips Design’s Philanthropy by Design program, established in 2005 in which, together with partners such as Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), public bodies and social players with complementary expertise and values, Philips Design donates its creative expertise and socio-cultural knowledge to create solutions to improve the health and environment of the more fragile categories of the world’s developing societies.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments posted (2)

  1. Do we actually know the current method is too basic and unreliable? This seems like just another single-purpose gadget to me.

  2. (1) Yes, it is another single purpose gadget, but the number of purposes doesn’t indicate much about its usefulness.

    (2) UNICEF has recommended that health care personnel have access to respiratory rate timers to improve on the current method. Here’s the 2006 report: Pneumonia The Forgotten Killer of Children.

    (3) I don’t know how much this device improves sensitivity and specificity over existing approaches (no timer, simple timer), but I imagine Philips should be looking at this.

    (4) Just a note: I believe the UNICEF protocol looks at respiratory rate AND lower chest indrawing.

Post a comment